Janet over at Adventures in Ethics and Science has gotten a bunch of us SB folks to get involved in raising money for school science programs. As the only current resident math geek around here, I’m expanding it from just science to also math.
What we’re doing is trying to get people to donate to DonorsChoose.org. That’s an organization where teachers who’s classrooms lack the supplies that they need can submit proposals, and donors can select specific proposals that they want to support. Each of the participants from SBs has picked a bunch of proposals that we think are valuable, and we’re asking you guys, our readers, to look at those proposals, and donate some money to whichever ones you think are worth supporting.
This is something that is very near and dear to my heart. Back in my college days, I did some teaching for something called the Educational Opportunity Fund in NJ. EOF is now gone due to budget cuts. But back then, the idea of it was, take a bunch of really smart kids from really bad schools, and bring them to Rutgers for the summer. For the summer, they worked two days a week, and took classes three days a week. During the school year, they also had to go to EOF classes every weekend. If they continued to participate in this all the way through high school, then EOF would give them a scholarship to Rutgers. I taught for the EOF summer program for three years. And I got to know some of the smartest, greatest kids you could ever hope to meet.
One of the things about working for EOF that used to depress me was talking to my kids about their normal schools. They went to schools where there weren’t enough textbooks – or often any textbooks – much less any better school supplies. If it wasn’t for EOF, most of these kids would never have had any chance to get to college: not because they weren’t smart enough, and not because they weren’t willing to work hard enough; and not even because the teachers in their schools weren’t good enough to prepare them for college. They would have had no chance simply because in a classroom with no books, with no paper, with no chalk – there’s no way to teach them.
My daughter started kindergarten this year. Her kindergarten classroom – just one kindergarten classroom for 20 kids – has more supplies for teaching math than the entire schools that my EOF kids went to.
It’s a god damned crime. Every school should have textbooks, blackboards, and the basic teaching materials that teachers need. Kids like the ones I taught in EOF are getting screwed over every day by schools that simply do not have the materials that they need to teach them.
So, I’ve gone through the proposals for math classes in the NYC area, and selected a big list of proposals, ranging over pretty much every grade level. They’re mostly small proposals for basic supplies that every math class should have.
Our wonderful Seed overlords have donated a bunch of goodies, as have a variety of other organizations drafted by SBers. If you want to donate some money to any of the things proposed by any of the SBers, send a copy of your contribution confirmation email to sb.donorschoose.bonanza@gmail.com, and you’ll be entered into a drawing to get one of those.
Go throw a few bucks at donorschoose. The GM/BM challenge is here. You can find all of the SB challenges through Janet’s post here.
I’ll be throwing in a couple of hundred dollars worth of pledges this afternoon. Why not help, and go over now and give them some money?
Category Archives: Chatter
A Mathematical Meme from Janet
Janet over at Adventures in Ethics and Science has tagged all of us newbies with a Pi meme. As the new math-geek-in-residence here, I’m obligated to take on anything dealing with Pi.
- 3 reasons you blog about science
- Because I genuinely enjoy teaching, and the one thing that I regret
about being in industry instead of academia is that I don’t get to teach.
Blogging gives me an opportunity to do something sort-of like teaching,
but on my own terms and my own schedule. - Because I’m obsessed with this stuff, and I love it, and I want to try
to show other people why they should love it too. - Because I’m a thoroughly nasty person who enjoys mocking idiots.
- Because I genuinely enjoy teaching, and the one thing that I regret
- Point at which you would stop blogging: This is an easy one. If it were to stop being fun.
- 1 thing you frequently blog besides science: I could cheat here, and say math. But that would be cheating, and we know math geeks never cheat, right? So that leaves music. I come from a family of musicians; my older brother was a professional french horn player and composer (before he went nutso and became a fundie ultra-orthodox rabbi); my younger sister is a music teacher. As a techie, I’m the black sheep of the family :-).
- 4 words that describe your blogging style: I’ll pick words that I’ve gotten in real feedback from readers. (1) informative, (2) engaging, (3) obnoxious, and (4) arrogant. (Guess which ones were feedback from people who were targets of bad-math critiques?)
- 1 aspect of blogging you find difficult: dealing with rude commenters.
- 5 SB blogs that are new to you.
- Afarensis. No, it’s not new to SB, but it’s new to me.
- A Blog Around the Clock. I used to read one Coturnix’s blogs back at the old home; now he’s merged three blogs into one here. Good stuff.
- Chaotic Utopia. One of my fellow newbies who’s got an obsession with fractals.
- Framing Science. The intersection of science and politics.
- Terra Sigillata. Taking on alt-woo medicine.
- 9 non-SB blogs: In no particular order:
- 2 important features of your blogging environment: this one is actually hard, because I don’t really have a single blogging environment. Best I can come up with is my IPod, and a network connection. (I constantly look at various online sources like wikipedia, mathworld, and various peoples webpages to check what I’m writing.)
- 6 items you would bring to a meet-up with the other ScienceBloggers:
- My powerbook. (Or MacBook if I ever get around to upgrading.)
- Geeky t-shirt.
- Sunglasses (to mask the glare of PZs fame 🙂 )
- A bottle of good rum. (inside joke)
- A Zagats guide. (What’s the point of getting together with fun people, and not going out for good food?)
- My lovely wife. She’s also a hopeless geek (computational linguistics), and a true expert at finding the very best food wherever she goes. Plus she can read maps, which I can’t. (I’m actually learning disabled – maps mean absolutely nothing to me. I have no idea how people use them to get places. Really.)
- 5 conversations you would have before the end of that meet-up: I’m going to cheat a bit… A couple of convos that Janet wants to have would involve me, so I’ll just join in.
- With both Abel Pharmboy and Janet about being from NJ.
- With Janet about math jokes.
- With Orac about the kinds of goofy sciffy we both seem to like.
- With Tara about Findlay, Ohio. I spent four years of my childhood outside of New Jersey, and that was in Findlay Ohio, In another of these memes that circulate around the geeks of the blogosphere, Tara mentioned that she grew up in that miserable little town. I’m curious to find out if it changed after my family left.
- With Abel Pharmboy, about alt-woo medicine. I’ve been meaning to take on some of the stupid mathematical arguments used by alt-med types, but I haven’t had the patience to sit through the gunk of their sites to track down the stuff where I can offer something new.
This weeks SB question: What else would I do with my life?
As usual, once a week, the Seed folks send all of us a question from one of the SB readers:
Assuming that time and money were not obstacles, what area of scientific research, outside of your own discipline, would you most like to explore? Why?
I’ve actually got two answers to that question.
First up: theoretical physics. I’m fascinated by the work that’s trying to unify quantum mechanics and relativity: string theory, the shape of extended dimensions, etc. The problem is, I think that this answer is probably cheating, even though it’s my second choice after what I’m doing now. Because what attracted me to what I’m doing is the math: computer science is a science of applied math with a deep theoretical side; and what attracts me to physics is also the beautiful deep math. In fact, the particular parts of physics that most interest me are the parts that are closest to pure math – the shape of dimensions in string theory, the strange topologies that Lisa Randall has been suggesting, etc.
If that’s cheating, and I really have to get away from the math, then I’d have to say evolutionary development, aka evo-devo. Around holiday time last year, PZ posted a list of books for science geeks, and one was by a guy named Sean Carroll (alas, no relation) on evolutionary development. I grabbed the book on his recommendation – and the ways that gene expression drives the development of living things, the way you can recognize the relationships between species by watching how they form; the way you can use the relationships between species to explore how features evolved – it’s just unbelievably cool.